<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LV= profits from the arms trade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shutdownhk.org.uk/lv-profits-from-the-arms-trade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shutdownhk.org.uk/lv-profits-from-the-arms-trade/</link>
	<description>The campaign against Heckler &#38; Koch in the UK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 15:18:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evey</title>
		<link>http://www.shutdownhk.org.uk/lv-profits-from-the-arms-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>Evey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shutdownhk.org.uk/lv-profits-from-the-arms-trade/#comment-668</guid>
		<description>An activist in LV=&#039;s home town of Bournemouth has been taking the council to task for accepting sponsorship from LV=, given the company&#039;s link to the arms trade.

LV=&#039;s current position is that they will review H&amp;K&#039;s lease when it expires in 2016. However, their latest reply on the subject is not as belligerent as their initial response, which is perhaps partly due to this Bournemouth-based activist keeping up the pressure.

The more people who take LV= to task for profiting from the arms trade, the closer we can get to shutting H&amp;K&#039;s factory down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An activist in LV=&#8217;s home town of Bournemouth has been taking the council to task for accepting sponsorship from LV=, given the company&#8217;s link to the arms trade.</p>
<p>LV=&#8217;s current position is that they will review H&amp;K&#8217;s lease when it expires in 2016. However, their latest reply on the subject is not as belligerent as their initial response, which is perhaps partly due to this Bournemouth-based activist keeping up the pressure.</p>
<p>The more people who take LV= to task for profiting from the arms trade, the closer we can get to shutting H&amp;K&#8217;s factory down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://www.shutdownhk.org.uk/lv-profits-from-the-arms-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 07:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shutdownhk.org.uk/lv-profits-from-the-arms-trade/#comment-666</guid>
		<description>Any progress? I&#039;ve my own reasons for opposing LV and so my enemy&#039;s enemy is my friend, as they say. R</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any progress? I&#8217;ve my own reasons for opposing LV and so my enemy&#8217;s enemy is my friend, as they say. R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

