Nottingham anti-arms-trade activist convicted

Rooftop occupation at Heckler & Koch

Rooftop occupation at Heckler & Koch

On May 20th at Nottingham Magistrates’ Court, anti-arms-trade activist Kirk Jackson was found guilty of aggravated trespass for his part in a protest that shut down an arms company for a day. He was given a twelve month conditional discharge and ordered to pay £350 court costs.

The charge arose from a February 18th protest at the Nottingham warehouse of international arms company Heckler & Koch. Before dawn, four activists locked themselves to the gates, preventing employees from entering, while Kirk and another activist climbed onto the roof and displayed banners accusing the company of “arming repressive regimes”.

Heckler & Koch has been the target of demonstrations since 2007 when Nottingham residents discovered its presence on the Lenton Lane industrial estate. The company has a long history of supplying weapons to unstable regions, and using licensed production deals in order to evade arms embargoes. This was the first direct action taken against the company.

The offence of aggravated trespass is committed if a person does something while trespassing that is intended to obstruct or disrupt lawful activity. Kirk argued that his only intention in displaying banners on the roof was to create a photo op for the attending media but the three magistrates accepted the Crown prosecutor’s argument that he was in a “joint enterprise” with the activists locked to the gates.

The other five activists had already pleaded guilty and been sentenced on March 17th.

Heckler & Koch MD Mike Thornton

Heckler & Koch MD Mike Thornton

Mike Thornton, the Managing Director of Heckler & Koch was in court as a witness. He seemed nervous and avoided eye contact with the defendant and his supporters, but his performance was revealing: Having sworn to tell the whole truth, he baulked when cross-examined about his company’s activities.

Most notably, when asked if his company carried out manufacturing at its Lenton Lane industrial unit, he looked very uncomfortable and asked the magistrates “Is it necessary to discuss that?” His response confirmed campaigners’ long-held suspicions that the warehouse is used to assemble automatic weapons.

Mr Thornton was given a copy of the Shut Down H&K campaign’s December 2009 open letter to him and asked if he had seen it before. He admitted to having received the letter, in which serious concerns about H&K were raised, and to having decided to ignore it. He did however concede that citizens have a legitimate right to protest against companies such as his.

Arms dealers love euphemisms and Thornton is no exception. He described his business as “defence sector”, his lethal wares as merely “product”, and when asked about the impact of the protest, he said “we were held back in what we were trying to achieve.” Spectators were struck by the similarities between Mr Thornton and the villainous arms company execs from Jean-Pierre Jeunet’s recent film Micmacs.

The 18th Feb blockade of Heckler & Koch

The 18th Feb blockade of Heckler & Koch

The prosecution’s police witness was Chief Inspector Stephen Haylett, who characterised the protest as “as good-natured as a demonstration gets”. This left the prosecution struggling to convince the court that Thornton was a victim of intimidation. In his statement, the arms company boss claimed that the protest left him feeling “vulnerable and intimidated”. “It was not known if [the protesters] were armed with any type of missiles,” said the man with the warehouse full of guns. (In fact, the reams of police video footage played in court showed the defendant wielding nothing more threatening than a cheese & pickle sandwich.)

It was Chief Inspector Haylett who told the activists on H&K’s roof that their banners would be returned, but in court he claimed that he couldn’t remember this, and so the bench agreed to the Crown’s request to destroy them. Fortunately, the campaign has already received a replacement banner from fellow anti-militarists in Germany.

Kirk Jackson and supporters outside court

Kirk and supporters outside Nottingham Magistrates' Court

Despite the disappointing verdict, Kirk remains positive. “I’m glad I took the case to trial,” he said. “Companies like Heckler & Koch are profiting from war and repression with the support of the UK government. The arms industry must be opposed.”

The six activists have been left with a total of £825 in fines plus costs but this is a fraction of the cost to the company of being closed down for a day. On an average working day, Heckler & Koch’s Nottingham unit exports over £35 000 of arms and makes more than £12 500 profit.

If you would like to help the activists to pay their costs, you can donate via the Shut Down H&K website.

11 comments to Nottingham anti-arms-trade activist convicted

  • Sam Quaker

    Well done Mr Jackson and everyone else involved.

    Brilliant action.

  • Webbo Friend of Fistandantilus

    First a cheese and pickle sandwich, then a very pointy banana. Is there no end to this man’s campaign of violent (yet nutritionally sound) intimidation?

    • Ms. L. Chatharaum

      Very funny!

      Why does HK not have an international sales department in Germany where they make these weapons?

      is there some EU regulations to ban them from selling to governments?

      • Skektek

        H&K does have an international sales department in Germany as well as in the UK.

        Occasionally the EU does place an arms embargoes on certain countries. However, H&K knows how to get around them.

        For example, during the massacres in East Timor, the EU placed an arms embargo on Indonesia. However, Heckler & Koch licensed Turkey, which is outside the EU, to make their weapons, which they sold on to Indonesia.

        The EU also placed an arms embargo on Zimbabwe, but in 2002, British comedian Mark Thomas was able to get several quotes for delivering H&K submachine guns (parts for which were made in Germany) to Mugabe’s regime.

  • Gotta love the intimidatory tactics used there, a bunch of people standing around with sandwich boards and banners against £35000 of guns. I really admire this man, he shows determination that is depressingly lacking in the UK today. If there were a few more people like him, and a few less who stand on the sidelines saying “you can’t change anything” maybe we would get rid of the arms trade once and for all.
    i’m seriously considering attending one of these protest sessions, if i can’t get the day off work i might donate some money to help the cause.

  • Bob from Briz

    Well Done kirk and partners.
    There are so few people willing to challenge the dysfunctional nature of our society and the role the arms companies in what is ‘normal’
    Respect and best wishes
    Bristol anti-militarists

  • SGM Cordova

    You anti-militarist dont seem to see the big picture here. These guys make some of the best weapons ive seen before. While i was deployed i never saw a single H&K weapon in the hands of the people i was fighting. Realy the only H&K weapon i saw was mine.

    Sergeant Major A. Cordova

    • Evey

      Er no, Cordova, I think it’s you who doesn’t get it. We’re not saying that H&K weapons aren’t well made – we’re saying that they are used for repression and wars of aggression, and not just by “the other side”, but by your side too.

  • SSG Mcknight

    Atleast we can kill with out causeing any pain to a person. Most of these guys on “the other side” couldn’t even shoot a still target. Like other companys H&K manufactures better guns to replace the older models that get into the hands of “the other side.”

    Staff Sergeant M. Mcknight (75th Airborne)

    • Evey

      McKnight, you gotta be trolling! You’re saying that being shot with a H&K weapon doesn’t cause pain to a person? Yeah right.

      The arms race that you are defending costs billions of dollars, fills the world with deadly weapons and is a waste of human effort.

  • Ed

    Well done people, keep protesting. Sad to see that the courts are again coming down like a ton of bricks upon protesters, while letting real criminals (bankers, tax evaders) run riot.

Leave a Reply